In Adelaide for the Landmark Tutorial

mainly wine...
Just had a shower in the lounge at Singapore airport, and I now I feel human again. I arrived here a few hours ago and headed off to meet with Yixin, Jules and Hsien Min, wine buddies here.
I'm in the BA lounge on my way to Singapore, where I'm going to catch up with some of my wine chums and then get back on the plane to head for Adelaide.
Check out this recent BBC News Piece on synaesthesia (the jumbling of the senses). It features Charles Spence, a researcher from Oxford University, who is working with Heston Blumenthal on a very interesting-sounding project...
Labels: perception, psychology
Labels: marlborough, New Zealand, Sauvignon Blanc
OK, last Riesling for a while. Had a glass with lunch and now a glass to finish the otherwise wine-less evening.
After all the fuss about standards/conflicts of interest with respect to the new reviewers at the Wine Advocate, Robert Parker's influential publication, they have released a new set of Writer Standards. Very sensible they are too: this should put that little storm in a teacup to bed (sorry for the mixed metaphors).
Individual Accountability: While I have never found anyone's wine?tasting notes compelling reading, notes issued by consensus of a committee are the most insipid and often the most misleading. Judgments by committees tend to sum up a group's personal preferences. But how do they take into consideration the possibility that each individual may have reached his or her decision using totally different criteria? Did one judge adore the wine because of its typicity while another decried it for the same reason, or was the wine's individuality given greater merit? It is impossible to know. That is never in doubt when an individual authors a tasting critique.
Committees rarely recognize wines of great individuality. A look at the results of tasting competitions sadly reveals that well?made mediocrities garner the top prizes, and thus blandness is elevated to the status of a virtue. Wines with great individuality and character never win a committee tasting because at least one taster will find something objectionable about the wine.
I have always sensed that individual tasters, because they are unable to hide behind the collective voice of a committee, hold themselves to a greater degree of accountability. The opinion of a reasonably informed and comprehensive individual taster, despite the taster's prejudices and predilections, is always a far better guide to the ultimate quality of the wine than the consensus of a committee. At least the reader knows where the individual stands, whereas with a committee, one is never quite sure. Every article and tasting note we issue is attributed specifically to the writer responsible.
You know I haven't seen that many good films of late. I don't know whether that's because there aren't so many good ones coming out, or just that we've been really bad at selecting what to watch.
Labels: films
Labels: sherry
Continuing my theme of really good inexpensive wines, here are a couple more you should try if you can.
Labels: Chile, leyda, Sauvignon Blanc
Labels: RTL
Labels: biodynamics, Chile, Douro, Portugal
Labels: RTL
Labels: writing
Spent a slightly truncated day at the London wine fair today (known as the LIWF). This is the huge annual trade fair held at Excel in London's Docklands each May. It's liked and loathed in equal measure by wine people, but I find it a useful place to organize meetings, and you usually pick up a few paying gigs that makes attendance worthwhile.
Labels: restaurants
Labels: New Zealand, restaurants
Labels: Portugal, vinho verde
Here's another VLOG, for those who like this sort of thing. It's me, talking about three Pinot Noirs.
Labels: Burgundy, New Zealand, pinot noir, video
As I mentioned in the previous post here, last night I popped into the Twickenham branch of Majestic and bought a few bottles. What did I get?
So what do Majestic need to do to improve what is already an very good wine shopping experience? As their estate has grown, the danger is that some interesting wines aren't available in large enough quantities to be spread reliably across all stores. The result is that you can sometimes find things in the stores that aren't on their website - presumably as the stock falls below a certain level it gets lifted from the website. And it would be nice if the buyers could pick up small parcels, spread them across just a few stores, but still make these wines accessible to web customers.
Yet the strength of the Majestic web business is that delivery - often the biggest headache for online operations - is managed at a local level by the nearest store, rather than being coordinated by a central warehouse. So the only way to make small parcels available via the web would be to have some sort of database integration between an individual store's stockholding, and the Majestic.co.uk website. Then a shopper could enter their postcode, and be shown not only the core range, but also any small parcels that their local stores have. This would be the icing on the cake for the website operation, although I imagine that there would be some significant technical hurdles to overcome.
Labels: Portugal
Labels: RTL
Labels: Chile
Labels: cricket
Labels: blind tasting, oregon, Port, south africa
Labels: blind tasting, Bordeaux, Chile
Labels: blind tasting, Chile
Labels: Bordeaux, st emilion, wine ageing
Labels: Australia, Cabernet Sauvignon, coonawarra, Margaret River
It was great to spend a day away from work today. Well, sort of. I was playing cricket, but with a bunch of wine trade colleagues, but that doesn’t count as work, does it?
Labels: cricket