|
Jamie's Blog [For the
uninitiated, a 'blog' (or weblog)
is a web journal with links. This gives me a chance to add short, 'off the record' style items that
wouldn't merit a separate article. I'll try to keep entries informal,
frequent, brief and (hopefully) interesting. We might even have the
odd guest blog. Let's see how it goes.]
Monday 14th January
Fancy a bit of wine travel? If you've got an innovative idea you could
earn yourself a £3000 travel bursary, courtesy of the Geoffrey
Roberts trust. Got to be worth a try. The press release is as
follows: "Geoffrey Roberts Award
2002 - go travel! The Geoffrey Roberts Trust has three thousand
pounds (approximately five thousand US dollars) to give away.
The annual Geoffrey Roberts Award is an international travel bursary
worth given to a potential achiever in the worlds of food, drink or
hospitality. The committee of the Geoffrey Roberts Trust, a
UK-registered charity established in memory of a pioneer importer of
fine New World wines, is now seeking applications for the 2002 Award,
deadline March 29, 2002. Full details and an application form are
available at www.jancisrobinson.com/geoffreyroberts.
Previous winners have included Jane Adams who
played an important part in introducing the farmers' market concept to
Sydney, Australia; Peter Kindel who travelled round Europe with
Caroline Smialek researching farmhouse cheese production and is now
big cheese at Artisanal, Manhattan's haven for cheese-lovers; and
South African Kate Thal who is using her bursary to research organic
wine production and has been running the wine division of a major
London restaurant group. The 2001 entries came from eight different
countries and the winner was Dru Reschke, a 26 year-old whose family
have farmed in Coonawarra, South Australia for several generations and
now make their own wine. He wants to develop his potentially extremely
valuable scheme for processing toxic winery effluent using enzyme
research. He plans to travel to the US to see how winery effluent is
managed by the big California companies and to survey wine tourism
there with a view to improving wine tourism back home in Coonawarra.
News of his Award reached him on his father's 60th birthday, so it was
announced to all and sundry at the celebrations at Coonawarra Town
Hall that night. Runners up included Patrick Farrell MD MW, a
California doctor who wants to write a book about wine and health;
Fiona Bird, Scottish mother of six who is keen to encourage more
children to cook; and a lively 20 year old Teh Peijing who wants to
broaden the range of wines imported into Singapore. The judges were
James Herrick of the Languedoc, David Brown of La Potiniere and John
Mariani of New York, as well as committee members Sally Clarke of
Clarke's restaurant in London W8, Willie Lebus of Bibendum Wines and
wine writer Jancis Robinson. Applications are invited from anyone of
any age, based anywhere in the world, who can convince us that they
will learn something while spending this travel bursary that will
improve the worlds of food, drink or hospitality."
Thursday 10th January
There's been a bit of a Spanish theme to my day, and one chap in
particular, Alvaro Palacios, has had a significant role
(although only through his wines). First, at a press tasting put on by
'The Bunch' (a fairly loose coalition of independent retailers,
involving Tanners, Adnams, Corney & Barrow, Yapp, Lay &
Wheeler and John Armit), the wine that intrigued me the most was the 1999
Bierzo from Descendientes J Palacios. Bierzo is a small,
hilly region in the northwest of Spain, inland from Galicia and at the
margins of Castilla y León, and this wine is the first vintage of a
new project shared between Alvaro Palacios and his nephew. Two wines
have been made: Bierzo Carullón, the top wine, and this regular
Bierzo from bought in grapes (both are predominantly Mencía, the
local grape, that was once thought to be the same as Cabernet Franc).
Beautifully packaged with an elegant capsule, this is an opaque purple
colour in the glass. Concentrated and dense, there's lots of lush,
pure fruit, lots of oak and a fair whack of tannin hiding underneath.
A big wine, it will be interesting to see how this develops. Yours for
£16.45 from Corney & Barrow. Then, this evening was a tasting of
new Spanish releases at La
Vigneronne. Lots of very tasty stuff here,
including a lovely 2000 Torres Fransola (their splendid premium
Sauvignon), a wonderful, dark, meaty 1997 Alion and three
lovely Riojas from CVNE (1994 Vina Real and Imperial and
1991 Vina Real). There was also a sensationally good 1982
Contino Gran Reserva, full of life and energy even almost 20 years
on. But the most interesting wine for me was again from Alvaro
Palacios: his 1997 Finca Dofi. This Priorat wine is initially a
little too showy and oaky on the nose, but the palate has a beautiful
mineral intensity underlying the complex herby fruit. Really
interesting stuff. It'll set you back a cool £45. Yes, that's the
only hitch: these days, premium Spanish wines ain't cheap.
Wednesday 9th January
Went to an interesting tasting last night. It was organized by
Peter May, who runs the Pinotage
Club (very 'niche'), and the wines on show were the ten Pinotages
voted as South Africa's best in a well-known blind tasting competition
organized by the ASBA bank and the Pinotage Organization. I won't say
much about the wines here (full write-up will of course follow), but
the tasting format deserves a mention. There were sixteen of us seated
either side of a long table, and we poured our own samples using a
snifter glass on which Peter had marked a line. This measure was
carefully calculated so that each person got precisely one sixteenth
of a bottle (46.875 ml). It sounds odd, but it's an ingenious solution
to the tricky problem of getting enough samples out of a single
bottle, and 46.875 ml is actually quite a good sized pour. For each
wine, participants on one side of the table then had to comment turn,
and although people were allowed to pass, few did. I found it a
revealing exercise, and a great way to assess a set of wines. First,
there was plenty of time to evaluate each wine in detail, and, second,
it was instructive to hear other people's views. Here was a bunch of
geeks, who just by virtue of being motivated enough to pay to attend a
wine tasting must represent the upper-most segment of the wine-buying
public, yet there was an amazing spread of opinions. It would have
been impossible to come up with any sensible consensus, and it's
certainly not a case of some being right, some being wrong. Saturday 5th January
Popped into the local Oddbins (Twickenham) last night and was
surprised to see the 1999 Beaucastel on the shelves. As most readers
are probably aware, Beaucastel is one of the leading properties in
Châteauneuf du Pape, making wines that invariably age brilliantly
(see my notes on a recent
Beaucastel vertical tasting), and it's not a wine you usually see
on the shelves of high street wine merchants. I asked about the price
(it wasn't indicated) and was nicely surprised: at £19.99 a bottle
this is a real bargain. Had you bought en primeur last year you'd have
paid £225 per case in bond from Bibendum (they aren't especially
expensive), which works out at £23.40 per bottle when duty and VAT
are tagged on. A typical shelf price for this wine would probably be
in the region of £30, if you can find it. Should you get hold of
some, don't drink it now: 1999 ws a good vintage but it really needs
tucking away for five years, or better a decade. It will last 20, I
suspect. Note added later: my press contact
at Oddbins tells me this was a pricing mistake. I was charged the
price for the 1997 (no longer stocked); the 1999 should have been
£25.99, and is available in Fine Wine stores plus a few selected
branches.
Wednesday 2nd January
For those of you who may have missed it, can I recommend to you
Andrew Jefford's recent
evening standard piece. He suggests that the last year "…has
been the worst year for British wine drinkers that I can remember and
the free market is revealing itself to be a strange and greedy friend."
This breif but punchy article takes a rather Waltonesque
look at the state of wine retailing, combined with a rather non-Waltonesque
criticism of Britain's alcohol culture ("Moderate drinking and
informed enjoyment are beautiful and life-enhancing; drunkenness is
pathetic, ugly and sad.") He's right, of course. On the high
street, Threshers, Wine Rack, Victoria Wine and Bottoms Up (all part
of the same chain, owned by a Japanese investment bank) are very poor
these days; only Oddbins continues to shine, although we'll all be
watching carefully now that the Castel Frères takeover has been
confirmed. And the supermarket ranges are contracting, with the
continued rise of the brands. The shame is that even as recently as
two or three years ago, they were so much better. He finishes on a
positive note: "Not all the news, of course, is bad. It's a
great time to be a wine merchant: the death of the high street and the
rise of brands mean there are yawning gaps for wine merchants to
exploit, though few do this with any imagination. If you're prepared
to put a bit of effort into your shopping, too, it's a great time to
be a drinker." This brings me back to one of my new year wine
resolutions: I must shop more creatively this coming year.
Monday 31st December
New year's eve, and chance to reflect on the past year and think
towards the next. And time for some wine resolutions. Number 1: drink
less but drink better. Always a good idea. Number 2: be more creative
in buying wine, supporting the merchants who really do good work, even
if it's more hassle than popping into the local supermarkets or high
street outlets. Number 3: buy more educational bottles, leaving my
comfort zone more frequently. Part of the joy of wine lies in its
diversity. Number 4: travel more. It's hard to write about wine
regions with any great insight if you've never caught the real flavour
of them first-hand. Finally, number 5: keep perspective, seeing wine
integrated as part of a rich, healthy lifestyle, not as an end in
itself. I'm sure I could think of more, but that's enough to be
getting on with.
Saturday 29th December
Four wines last night shared with internet wine personality Yixin Ong,
who was stopping over at our modest abode in Twickenham as part of the
first leg of his world tour. First, a youthful, expressive Riesling
from the Wachau in Austria (Knoll's Ried Loibenberg Loibner
Riesling Federspiel 1999). Very minerally and a little closed last
night, I'm sipping the remnants as I write, and it's showing a lot
more complexity. Completely different, the next wine was quite a nice
surprise: the fairly modestly priced Zind Humbrecht Herrenweg
Turckheim Riesling 1993 was punching well above its weight. Very
expressive nose, minerally and limey; palate fruity, spicy and with a
touch of residual sugar. Alsace again for wine three: Marc
Kreydenweiss' 1998 Clos du Val d'Éléon. It's an unusual blend of
Pinot Gris and Riesling from an old vineyard that Marc has restored,
and is another mineralic wine, but with a touch of Pinot Gris fatness
and a slightly austere palate. I like it, but Yixin isn't keen.
Finally, a surprisingly rich cool-climate Italian red from the Lagrein
grape (thought to be an ancestor of the Syrah grape by some). The Laimberg
Lagrein Dunkel Riserva 1998, Südtiroler Alto Adige is a very
deep, almost black colour, and shows an attractive rich, sweetness to
the fruit, but it avoids being confected or artificial. It's quite a
big, dense wine, but a real softie: I'd be interested to know what
sort of oak this sees. Fiona was probably bored stupid by a lot of the
wine talk, but she was polite enough not to say anything about it.
Yixin is only in his early 20s, but he has wine knowledge beyond his
years. One of the many topics we agreed on was the state of wine
discussion on the internet. It was a lot better a couple of years ago
in the golden era of the Wine
Lover's Discussion Group (WLDG), where many of the leading
internet wine personalities first met (I'll probably get into trouble
for saying this). These days there's not enough interesting discussion
there, and the alternatives that have sprung up tend to lack
both the breadth of knowledge and international spread of participants
that the WLDG enjoyed in its glory years. Best are the ones that don't
take themselves too seriously.
Thursday 20th December
Unable to shave for a few weeks following my op, I'm currently
sporting a beard. I don't like it, but at least while I'm a member of
the face fungus club I've got a good excuse to turn my sights aside
from wine for a short while to focus on real ale, the bearded folk's
tipple of choice (apologies here to all bearded readers for this gross
mischaracterization). I'm actually a great admirer of cask-conditioned
ales (to give them their correct name), a unique and living product,
but one which has been under severe threat in recent decades. That
cask ales still exist at all is largely thanks to one outfit,
the Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA), a grass-roots organization of
enthusiasts who have lobbied and campaigned successfully to preserve
and promote this worthy drink. According to their
website, CAMRA's mission is to act as champion of the consumer in
relation to the UK and European beer and drinks industry, aiming to
promote quality, choice and value for money; support the public house
as a focus of community life; campaign for greater appreciation of
traditional beers, ciders and perries as part of national heritage and
culture; and seek improvements in all licensed premises and throughout
the brewing industry. They also publish the successful Camra
Good Beer Guide, which steers drinkers to pubs where cask ales are
taken seriously and are properly kept. If you want to know a bit more
about real ale and how it is made, then there's a well
written primer here. It makes me wonder whether there's a need for
similar organizations to CAMRA, but fighting to preserve the regional
identity and character of the classic wine styles. In the light of the
rise of branded, manipulated, international style wines, I suspect
there is. Monday 17th December
The last weekend we've been visiting relatives who've just moved
down to the west country. A village called Braunton, in North Devon,
to be precise. It's just inland from Croyde, where we spent a pleasant
but chilly afternoon playing with the kids on the beach. Croyde is
bizarre. The population is split neatly into two polarized but quietly
coexisting groups: half the locals are bungalow-inhabiting retirees,
the other half are the surfers (almost all of whom are under 30).
Surfing is a religion here. Even though the temperature was only just
above freezing point, there were still three or four surfers out there
chasing a few unremarkable breakers. They're barmy. But the most
remarkable episode of the weekend occurred in a rather soulless
carvery-style pub we had a quick drink in on Saturday evening. If you
order white wine in this pub (we didn't; we were on beer), you get a
choice. It's between 'dry Chardonnay', or 'medium sweet Liebfraumilch',
both of which are dispensed from beer-style nitrogen driven taps. A
punter ordered a dry white wine, and after three quarters of the glass
had been filled, the barrel (or whatever the pressurized container the
wine comes in is called) fizzled to a stop. The barman, with no trace
of shame, asked the aforementioned punter whether they wanted this
glass topped up 'with some medium sweet'. The punter, remarkably,
agreed. But then perhaps this is not so remarkable: after all, we
geeks make up but a tiny, marginalized group of society. For most
people, wine is just a commodity, and they would no more worry about
the exact type of wine they were drinking than the brand of instant
coffee or sliced white bread they popped into their shopping trolleys.
I think this is changing, but it looks like the pub industry won't be
leading the way…
Tuesday 11th December
A few nice surprises lurking among several bottles consumed
domestically over the last week. Last night was a very satisfying
Alsace white (Materne Haegelin Riesling Bollenberg 1999). Bone
dry, with an intensely appealing savoury minerality. A bargain at
Majestic's £5.99 multibuy price. Also from Majestic was another
remarkable bargain from California: the Durney Cabernet Sauvignon
1994, which they are shifting for a penny under four quid. There's
a touch of seductive blackcurrant fruit on the nose, and this leads to
a concentrated, intensely savoury palate with mouth-drying tannins and
a fair whack of oak. Normally I suspect this would retail for about
£10, so you can view this either as a slightly flawed (overaked and
drying out) £10 wine, or a superb, semi-serious £4 wine. I like it.
Certainly the most unusual wine of the week was a 1994 Chapel Hill
Riesling, from the Eden Valley of South Australia. Bought a number
of years ago in a Wine Rack clearout sale, I thought I'd see how it's
doing with several years' bottle age. It's a golden colour with a
subtle, evolved, petrolly nose and a marmalade-tinged palate. It's
still alive, but I don't actually like it that much (lesson, if you
are cellaring a certain type of wine, first make sure that you like
what it's likely to turn into). Also a tiny bit disappointing was the Terra
de Lobos 2000, Ribatejo (£3.99 Waitrose). Recommended by Jancis
Robinson a month or so ago (before she went purple), I found it
enjoyable enough but was a little put off by the bubblegum edge to the
rather confected nose of sweet herbal fruit. It smells like they've
been using the same cultured yeasts and techniques (including carbonic
maceration) that are used for most commercial Beaujolais. The next day
some of this faux sheen had blown off, and there was some intriguing
chocolatey richness to the otherwise light palate, so maybe Jancis'
recommendation wasn't too far off. I'd been expecting great things
from the next bottle, a nicely packaged Château L'Euzière Cuvée
Les Escarboucles 1998, Pic St Loup (£8.99 Unwins). Before local
winemerchant chain Fuller's was taken over by Unwins a couple of years
back, wine buyer Roger Higgs had sourced an enviable range from this
fascinating Languedoc commune. The L'Euzière is one of the few
remnants of this, and while it is nice enough it lacks the meaty,
earthy character that is so typical of its better peers. It's showing
a bit too much oak, too. I wasn't disappointed with the Sainsbury's
Prestige Claret 2000, but only because I wasn't expecting much in
the first place. Even the fact that it's made by an Australian can't
help disguise the presumably crappy, dilute, slightly unripe grapes it
was wrought from. No value here, even at half price (precisely £2.19,
I believe). Finally, to finish on a high note, I was very impressed by
the San Biagio Barolo 1996, Piedmont (£16.95 Berry Bros). Made in a
modern style, but still a relatively light colour for such an
obviously concentrated wine. The Nebbiolo grape isn't about fruit:
instead, in a good Barolo you get a wonderfully complex herby, spicy,
undergrowth-like character, along with a fair whack of tannin. It's
infanticide to broach this now, but it's still enjoyable even in its
youth. Quite lovely.
Monday 10th December
I don't like to be negative, but if I'm going to be any use as a
wine commentator, there'll be times when I have to criticise the poor
as well as praising the good. So when I found out about the 'Chardonnay
of the Century - Million Dollar Challenge' in a Decanter
news piece, I knew straight away that I'd have to be entering
negative mode. Why? It's completely and utterly barking. Give me a
moment and I'll try to explain why it is one of the silliest ideas
I've heard in a very long time.
The competition has two rather disparate goals. First, it aims to
identify a list of the world's leading 100 Chardonnays from several
thousand they hope will be submitted, and to identify from this list
The World's Best Chardonnay. The person submitting this wine (be it
producer or even private collector) will win a prize CDN$500 000.
Second, each wine must be submitted in case quantities, with six
bottles going into he cellars at the University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, for 'research' purposes. More about this later.
My main gripe is that the foundation for this competition is the
fantasy that it is possible to identify the 'best' Chardonnay, or that
such a wine even exists. While a good taster can sort a group of wines
into broad quality categories, within each of these subsets the exact
ranking will largely be a matter of personal preference and taste.
While California and Burgundy, for example, both produce some world
class Chardonnays, the difference in style is such that they can't
really be compared head-to-head. It would be just as daft within
Burgundy to attempt to compare a top, unoaked Grand Cru Chablis with a
first-rate barrel-fermented Mersault. They're different. Now add to
the equation the effect of age, and the silliness is multiplied yet
further: some people prefer old wines to young. Who's to say which
opinion is correct?
Using my oft-quoted analogy, asking the question 'what is the best
wine?' is about as sensible as asking a carpenter 'what is the best
tool?'. The merit of a particular wine is highly context-dependent.
Given access to any Chardonnay on the planet, some days I might prefer
a full-on Montrachet, other days a toasty South African, and yet other
days a crisp, unoaked Chablis. Each style can be thought of as best in
its own context.
Competitions are largely a marketing exercise. The fact that the
competition allows entries from private collectors acknowledges that
half-decent Burgundy producers don't bother entering competitions.
Most of them have no problems selling their wine every year (after
all, they don't make a great deal, unlike their counterparts in
Bordeaux), and have nothing to gain (and a lot to lose) by having
their wines 'judged' by someone with little experience or
understanding of what they are all about. It will be interesting to
see whether the competition does attract the sorts of Burgundies that
are widely acknowledged to be among the best expressions of this
style.
Finally, about that 'research project', a second goal of the
competition. Dr Hennie van Vuuren is the chap behind it all. He heads
up the newly formed Wine Research Center, and states that 'the
objective of the study is to determine the aging potential of the
world's top one hundred Chardonnays and to establish the contribution
of soil type, rootstock, Chardonnay clones, yeast, barrel and aging on
the quality and finesse of this varietal.' But the University hopes to
have up to 20 000 bottles of the finest Chardonnays by the end of the
contest. If research is really their objective, wouldn't it be simpler
just to ask some of the leading producers for samples, and then use
these? Why the competition? My other question: if they are conducting
research into just the top 100 (600 bottles altogether), what will
they do with the other 19 400 bottles? I think I might apply for a
faculty position here, especially if they fulfil their intention to
hold the competition every four years with a different variety each
time! Care for a glass of Montrachet, Professor?
Previous entries (some gripping
reading!)
Back to top |