Robert Parker retires

It has been announced today that the world’s most famous wine critic has retired. The critic in question, Robert Parker, pretty much invented the genre, and was the first to use the 100 point scale that has now almost universally been adopted by wine critics. There are now perhaps 25 wannabe Parkers plying their trade as serious, professional wine critics, 10 of whom are employed by the newspaper he set up, The Wine Advocate (TWA). Lead critic there, Lisa Perrotti-Brown, today broke the news of Parker’s final retirement at the age of 71 (he’d pretty much pulled back from most reviewing already).

I never met Parker. I almost did, once, when the new Singapore-based owners of TWA arranged for him to come to London in 2015 for some events, including a press conference. But they had blacklisted Tim Atkin and I for our perceived negative approach to the publication (see [Not] Meeting Robert Parker.]

Like many, when I discovered wine, his book was one of the first I consulted. I loved the way it was opinionated, pretty comprehensive, and written with such obvious enthusiasm.

I had no idea at the time that he was a controversial figure, or that some people disagreed with his preferences. At the time (mid-1990s), I didn’t realize that respected professionals actually disagreed on the merits of some wines. I just thought good wine was good wine, and his strongly expressed opinions were therefore worth following.

Then I began discussing wine on internet Bulletin Boards, such as the Wine Lover’s Discussion Group (WLDG). This had spun off from a previous wine board operated by a service provider called Prodigy, which Robert Parker was a frequent contributor to. Hanging around on the WLDG was a great way to learn about wine, because you could eavesdrop on the conversations between experienced collectors and professionals, and hear what they really thought. And on travels to the USA with work I used to meet up with some of the contributors in events called ‘offlines’. This was the late 1990s, and it was a fertile time for wine on the Internet.

Indeed, there’s a really interesting write up of a dinner that Robert Parker hosted for some of the people who were on the Prodigy board. This was back in 1996. It’s a fascinating read.

Lots has been written about this important figure in the world of wine.

Parker kicked things off, and now wine criticism is here to stay. Is there a new Parker? He nominated Antonio Galloni as his successor, but things went sour and there ended up being talk of legal action. The fiercely ambitious Galloni now has his own wine review empire. James Suckling, once of The Wine Spectator, also has a team of reviewers and holds events around the world. It seems that the future lies with a range of critics, each with their own audience, rather than one kingmaker.

The cloud on the horizon of wine criticism is score creep, though. When Parker established his reputation, he used a much wider range of scores. The competition to be the critic that is quoted has led most to score ever higher, so now the effective score band for fine wines is much smaller. Soon the high-90s will be so cluttered that all fine wines will effectively get the same score.

For now, let’s raise a toast to Bob Parker.

 

 

4 comments to Robert Parker retires

  • Patrick

    There’s also a nice interview (with farting dog!) on the Mondovino TV series (essentially a 10 hour version of the film). Made in 2002-3 it now seems like ancient history…

  • I did a few interviews with him on my radio show and found him to be so humble and real. Whether you agree with his ratings or preferred styles of wine he did totally change the wine industry and how ratings are done. I guess time will tell where we go from here. Here is my first interview with him: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-sipping-point-robert-parker-jr/id483029592?i=1000365624874

    Thanks for all you do Jamie–love your writing!

  • Doug Goodwillie

    Jamie,

    Of all of the reactions to RMP’s official retirement I enjoyed your piece the most. Your take on the compression of the scores in numerical wine rating is spot on. Wine writers have fully come to realize that no one seems to want to read about average wine. When I became really interested in Bordeaux I very much appreciated Parker’s direction to good wines that may have been buried in vintages characterized as poor. We enjoyed many cases of excellent Bordeaux from the ’92,’93 &’94 vintages for a pittance. That sort of coverage is in short supply today.

  • Eran Pick

    I loved his interviews on Charlie Rose early 2000s
    Very intersting
    https://charlierose.com/videos/25275

    A hard working professional

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*