jamie goode's wine blog: River Cottage goes lame

Friday, November 10, 2006

River Cottage goes lame

You have to be careful when you’re preaching to others about what they should eat. I was uncomfortable with some of the content on Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s program The River Cottage Treatment last night—quite apart from the fact that it was contrived reality TV that didn’t work very well. The basic idea behind the program is a good one: take some regular punters whose diet mainly consists of ready meals and take-aways, and get them to cook ‘real’ food. So Hugh gets these people to camp in a field at the bottom of the garden, and does food-related things with them.

Last night in the segment I saw they gathered blackberries and went to see a couple of Hugh’s sheep being slaughtered (he thought this was important—or maybe his producer thought it was important because it would make good TV—and much weeping ensued at the admittedly rather gory demise of the lambs, although to the credit of the punters only one of them turned vegetarian as a result).

The bit I was uncomfortable with, though, was where Hugh took them to some food safety officer to show them just how bad the food was eating. It was an unbelievably lame segment. They took a burger and the food scientist chap prepared a row of bottles containing the ‘chemicals’ that had been added to it. The punters were shown this row of chemicals (all of them white powders) and Hugh then asked a burger-eating chap how he felt about it. The guy looked fairly clueless, but on pressing by Hugh he sort of agreed how horrifying and disgusting it was. Hugh had more luck when the food scientist read the ingredients list on a Tikka Masala ready meal, because he found it contained E120 (cochineal). Hugh turned to a girl (whose intellect resembled Alice off the Vicar of Dibley) and triumphantly announced, ‘That comes from beetles!’ The girl obliged, a look of horror crossing her face, ‘I’ve been eating beetles, ugh!’ The irony that this is in fact a natural food colouring was lost on all of them. Look, I agree that it’s best to eat food that’s been messed about with as little as possible, but to use this sort of manipulative, fear-based propaganda about ‘bad’ food isn’t the way to go. It makes bad television, too.

Labels: , ,

10 Comments:

At 2:55 PM, Anonymous Robert McIntosh said...

Wonder what HFW would make of 'natural' fining agents in wine!?

I do agree that it sounds like more propaganda than education. Surely they could have found more realistic ways of getting the general point across? The spirit of what he was trying to do was probably justified however.

 
At 8:05 PM, Anonymous Doug said...

But television is reductive and facile. I suppose it is increasingly being made for the "short-attention-span" generation and the temptation is to simplify arguments and caricature positions. Also to create pointless cartoon conflict. Could anyone forget the Hell's Kitchen episodes with Gary Rhodes and J-C Novelli prancing around like a couple preening popinjays drunk on testosterone and self-importance. I could.

Look at the rubbish talked about organic wine. The word seems to have become the intellectual property of some bureaucratic busybodies and is not, as it should be, an indication of quality or even necessarily good practice. We are so obsessed by labels; we spend more time reading the packaging than consuming the stuff.

Finally, just a thought. How do they find the people to participate in these social experiments? Do researchers hang around supermarkets snooping into the shopping baskets of "sad and lonely people" or are the participants really actors from central docu-drama casting? I think we should be told!

 
At 9:03 PM, Anonymous Stuart Peskett said...

Jamie,
You should be used to TV channels and national newspapers handling specialist topics like this.

While I realise that they were over-facile describing the additives in certain foods, what they were basically saying was what we all know: ready meals are processed foods containing God knows what.

Just look at the way wine stories are reported in the nationals – when I read the misleading (and often, plain wrong) things written about wine in the nationals, I do wonder if I can believe many so-called technical stories in the papers...

 
At 9:38 AM, Anonymous keith prothero said...

Yes it is nearly as bad as the crackpots who go on about cricket on a certain wine forum ha ha

 
At 6:37 PM, Anonymous Stuart Peskett said...

*sighs*

Another day, another non-sequitur from Mr Pinotage...

 
At 11:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I find commissioning editor controlled television banal, contrived and utterly useless. From an ex BBC documentary director! www.douglasblyde.co.uk

 
At 12:14 PM, Blogger Jan-Tore Egge said...

Re. how did they find...: I don't know how they ended up with the people who were actually in the series, but they did ask on the River Cottage web site and in the RC newsletter for people to suggest suitable candidates.

I haven't seen the series (I don't have British TV, so I only get to see this stuff once a DVD ha been released), but I find the way the previous RC series (Road Trip) is produced a bit of a nuisance. The cutting looks as if it's trying to compete with that scene from Psycho, the out-of-focus close-ups seem to be competing with Jamie and it's all a bit rushed. And made for people with a memory span of ten seconds. Do all TV channels require series to be made this way? (I have no problem with the contents of that series, by the way.)

 
At 5:46 PM, Anonymous Podchef said...

Over here in the States we have nothing close to River Cottage or HFW so its a bit refreshing. However, the newer stuff has all fallen vitim to the all too common ploy of repeated info, recaps and reused voice overs--like we've all fogotten what we've just been watching while sat in front of the box for 45 minutes.

I saw the first "Treatment" but it was a bit predictable. Like Hell's Kitchen or any show where you invite others into the host's world on a competative level it all goes a bit pear-shaped and boring.

At least it's not as bad as most American TV where they pick the mix of people who will lead to the most dramatic and unstable of outcomes. Then no one gains. Let's just hope HFW doesn't take the inevitble jump--like Mr. Oliver--to podcasting and drag the rest of us down. . . .

 
At 4:22 PM, Blogger chickenhouse said...

Well said!
I have stumbled across your blog by following links when I really should be working, and I found your analysis of the latest River Cottage series to be spot on. I come at it from another angle - I work in the drinks industry (soft, not alcoholic unfortunately) and identified a number of inaccuracies in what HFW said. Anyone can "prove" anything with statistics and hidden filming, and bashing the food industry is getting very repetitive. My thoughts on the last episode are here (ignore the guff about the baby to start with...)

 
At 2:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

wow gold cheap wow gold buy wow gold world of warcraft gold wow world of warcraft wow gold WoW Warrior WoW Hunter WoW Rogue WoW Paladin WoW Shaman WoW Priest WoW Mage WoW Druid WoW Warlock power leveling powerleveling wow power leveling wow powerleveling wow guides wow tips google?? google???? google???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? LED? ?? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? powerlin518 logo design website design web design ????

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home