{"id":16238,"date":"2016-11-12T20:58:48","date_gmt":"2016-11-12T20:58:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/?p=16238"},"modified":"2016-11-12T20:58:48","modified_gmt":"2016-11-12T20:58:48","slug":"debate-what-should-british-columbias-identity-be-as-a-wine-region","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/canada\/debate-what-should-british-columbias-identity-be-as-a-wine-region","title":{"rendered":"Debate: what should British Columbia&#8217;s identity be as a wine region?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-16239\" src=\"http:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/cornucopiawinesummit-500x329.jpg\" alt=\"cornucopiawinesummit\" width=\"500\" height=\"329\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/cornucopiawinesummit-500x329.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/cornucopiawinesummit-150x98.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/cornucopiawinesummit-400x263.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/cornucopiawinesummit.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>One of the sessions at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thewinesummit.com\" target=\"_blank\">Cornucopia Wine Summit<\/a> was a good old fashioned debate about the future of BC (British Columbia, Canada) wine.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What should BC\u2019s identity be as a wine region?<br \/>\nWhat does BC want to be when it grows up? A region known for high quality, focused on a few flagship varietals and blends that speak to BC\u2019s sense of place? Or a region known for a wide range of interesting varietals, with varying styles and definitions of what represents BC?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Compered by local councillor Jack Crompton, the debate was cleverly run, with each member of the audience being given two ping pong balls. At the beginning we all voted whether or not we agreed with the motion, and then after the debate we voted again. The winning side was the one who had successfully changed the most minds.<\/p>\n<p>The resolution? <strong>\u2018Be it resolved that BC\u2019s wine identity should reflect a distinctive region known for a few flagship varietals and blends.\u2019<\/strong><br \/>\nAt the moment the Okanagan has no real specialism, and works with lots of different varieties, including Pinot Gris, Chardonnay, Riesling, Sauvignon Blanc and Semillon for the whites, and Merlot, Syrah, Cabernet Sauvignon, Pinot Noir and Gamay for the reds.<\/p>\n<p>Defending the motion were <strong>David Paterson<\/strong> (from Tantalus) and <strong>Sid Cross<\/strong>. Opposing were <strong>Cynthia Enns<\/strong> (of Laughing Stock) and <strong>Andrew Windsor<\/strong> (from Tinhorn Creek).<\/p>\n<p>David kicked off. He said that BC is producing too much wine for the domestic market, so the only option is to produce less wine, or fine export markets. So export it has to be. But there\u2019s a problem. \u2018The region lacks identity and focus,\u2019 David says. \u2018We need a tight focus to be relevant internationally. Producers need to focus on their terroir and what is working.\u2019 Merlot is currently the most planted red variety, but he says, \u2018it makes boring wine with no sense of identity: it is not a variety we can hang our hat on.\u2019 David says that signature varieties are needed. \u2018We will never have volume or cheap labour, or economies of scale, so we can only compete with signature wines of high quality.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>David made the point that \u2018diversity is a feeble identity.\u2019 He then identified four varieties that BC should focus on: Riesling, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and Syrah.<\/p>\n<p>Cynthia Enns replied. She spoke from two perspectives, first as a farmer and second as a business owner. \u2018We\u2019ve just completed our 14th harvest [at Laughing Stock in the Okanagan] and we are still figuring it out.\u2019 She says that from a business point of view, focusing doesn\u2019t make sense. The Okanagan makes just two million cases of wine a year as a region, so there\u2019s no need to export. \u2018Why focus? The economics don\u2019t work.\u2019 Cynthia gave an example of the sort of sums that would be involved in specializing if replanting was demanded. At the moment the top planted white variety is Pinot Gris, at 12% of vineyard area. To double this area of Pinot Gris by replanting would cost CA$72 m, she calculated, including the lost vintages while the new vines established themselves. She also pointed out the Naramata Bench (where she is) wineries all sold out this summer. So why replant? \u2018We have to focus on making delicious wine and raising the quality bar,\u2019 she concluded.<\/p>\n<p>Sid Cross began by pointing out that no one knows what the signature grapes of BC are. BC should concentrate on what it does well. \u2018We don\u2019t want Cabernet Sauvignon, Pinot Gris or Merlot,\u2019 he said. \u2018We don\u2019t want any more Sauvignon Blanc with residual sugar: stop that!\u2019 He added, \u2018we need to make ourselves unique. We can still make things for ourselves, but we need to get the word out we do some things well.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Andrew Windsor finished off the main debate. \u2018We do a lot of wines really well,\u2019 he said, before launching into a description of the complex soils and geology of the Okanagan. It really is varied, not just in climate terms (there\u2019s a massive difference between the north and south), but also in terms of what the vineyard soils consist of. \u2018We don\u2019t want to force two, three, or four grape varieties on these regions,\u2019 he stated. \u2018Diversity also leaves us in a better position against climate change,\u2019 added Andrew.<\/p>\n<p>There was then some back and forth, some questions from the floor (most were comments, not questions) and a summing up session. Then we voted with our remaining ping pong ball. Although the vote would have carried the motion, Cynthia and Andrew won because more people changed sides to support their viewpoint.<\/p>\n<p>What do I think? I agree, there are significant climate differences between the north and south of the Okanagan, and this means that Pinot is great in the north but would be horrible in the south. Chardonnay does well from north to south, as does Syrah. Riesling is best further north. There are the climates and soils within the Okanagan to do many things well, and it would be a shame to restrict the number of varieties grown there.<\/p>\n<p>A lot depends on where the wines will be sold. If the vision of the Okanagan is simply to be a region that makes good wines for local consumption, then there\u2019s no problem with the diversity that\u2019s currently on show. But I think the Okanagan could be more ambitious, and play on a global rather than local stage. If it is to do this, what\u2019s the message it should take to the world? Currently, it suffers from a lack of focus. The message, \u2018we do lots of things quite well,\u2019 is a disastrous one. It\u2019s so much better to focus. Going to the world with a simplified message doesn\u2019t necessitate telling people what they can grow or oblige people to rip out vines. The whole region would benefit from more focus and a clearer message, and export success in turn would give the wines more credibility on the domestic market. It\u2019s for this reason I voted for the motion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the sessions at the Cornucopia Wine Summit was a good old fashioned debate about the future of BC (British Columbia, Canada) wine. What should BC\u2019s identity be as&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[364],"class_list":["post-16238","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-canada","tag-canada"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16238","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16238"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16238\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16240,"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16238\/revisions\/16240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wineanorak.com:\/wineblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}